home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c++-part2 / 16958 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  825 b 
  1. Path: nntp.uio.no!solace!user
  2. From: lars.farm@nts.mh.se (Lars Farm)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
  4. Subject: Re: Why don't you use garbage collection
  5. Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 00:34:57 +0200
  6. Organization: pv
  7. Message-ID: <AD94A731966836BF@dialup97-6-14.swipnet.se>
  8. References: <316D291F.465D@sto.fdata.se> <1996Apr12.170708.1835@ittpub> <AUSTERN.96Apr12095652@isolde.mti.sgi.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup97-6-14.swipnet.se
  10. Mime-Version: 1.0
  11. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
  12. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
  13.  
  14. In article <AUSTERN.96Apr12095652@isolde.mti.sgi.com>,
  15. austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com (Matt Austern) wrote:
  16.  
  17. >In C++ we're used to the idea that heap-allocated and stack-allocated
  18. >objects have different rules.  It's not so radical to introduce
  19. >garbage-collected objects as a third category.
  20.  
  21. My sentiments exactly.
  22.  
  23.  
  24.